You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Applying the Model-Comparison Approach to Test Specific Research Hypotheses in Psychophysical Research Using the Palamedes Toolbox
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, July 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01250 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nicolaas Prins, Frederick A. A. Kingdom |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 20% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 20% |
| Australia | 1 | 10% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 10% |
| India | 1 | 10% |
| Germany | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 2 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 60% |
| Scientists | 4 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 221 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 221 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 42 | 19% |
| Researcher | 30 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 24 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 7% |
| Other | 40 | 18% |
| Unknown | 48 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 59 | 27% |
| Neuroscience | 38 | 17% |
| Engineering | 14 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 4% |
| Other | 24 | 11% |
| Unknown | 66 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2018.
All research outputs
#6,656,774
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#9,500
of 34,796 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,434
of 343,893 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#288
of 723 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34,796 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,893 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 723 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.