↓ Skip to main content

Is Your Color My Color? Dividing the Labor of the Stroop Task Between Co-actors

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Is Your Color My Color? Dividing the Labor of the Stroop Task Between Co-actors
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, August 2018
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01407
Pubmed ID
Authors

Motonori Yamaguchi, Emma L. Clarke, Danny L. Egan

Abstract

Performing a task with other actors involves two opposing forces, division of labor between co-acting individuals and integration of divided parts of the task into a shared mental representation (co-representation). Previous studies have focused primarily on the integration of task representations and limited attention has paid to the division of labor. The present study devised a test of the integration and the division in a joint task setting. A joint version of the Stroop task was developed, in which pairs of actors were assigned different sets of target colors. If the actors integrate their co-actor's task, the colors assigned to their co-actor should be represented as if they were the actor's own target colors; the Stroop effect should be as large when distractor color words denote their co-actor's target colors as when these words denote the actor's own target colors. If the actors divide the labor of the Stroop task, the colors assigned to their partner should be represented as non-target colors; the Stroop effect should be smaller when the distractor color words denote the co-actor's target colors than when these words denote the actor's own target colors. The results of response time did not provide clear support for either position, while those of response accuracy supported the division of labor. Possible cognitive mechanisms that support the division of labor and the integration of task representation are discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 29%
Student > Bachelor 3 18%
Student > Postgraduate 2 12%
Researcher 2 12%
Professor 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 3 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 9 53%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Philosophy 1 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Engineering 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2019.
All research outputs
#6,330,215
of 23,096,849 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#9,140
of 30,483 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#109,662
of 330,723 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#310
of 720 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,096,849 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,483 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,723 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 720 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.