↓ Skip to main content

Corrigendum: Biofunctional Understanding and Judgment of Size

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Corrigendum: Biofunctional Understanding and Judgment of Size
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, August 2018
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01515
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zheng Jin, Yang Lee, Zheng Yuan

Abstract

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00436.].

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 1 50%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 1 50%
Sports and Recreations 1 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2018.
All research outputs
#18,648,325
of 23,102,082 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#22,638
of 30,505 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#257,297
of 334,958 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#639
of 738 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,102,082 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,505 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,958 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 738 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.