You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Good Things for Those Who Wait: Predictive Modeling Highlights Importance of Delay Discounting for Income Attainment
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, September 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01545 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
William H. Hampton, Nima Asadi, Ingrid R. Olson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 68 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 10 | 15% |
| United States | 7 | 10% |
| Switzerland | 3 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 4% |
| Japan | 2 | 3% |
| Canada | 2 | 3% |
| Australia | 2 | 3% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 2 | 3% |
| South Africa | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 16% |
| Unknown | 24 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 53 | 78% |
| Scientists | 10 | 15% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 56 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 9 | 16% |
| Researcher | 8 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Unknown | 16 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 19 | 34% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 5% |
| Engineering | 2 | 4% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 16% |
| Unknown | 18 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 358. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2024.
All research outputs
#91,554
of 25,810,956 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#173
of 34,800 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,817
of 346,755 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#7
of 748 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,810,956 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34,800 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,755 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 748 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.