You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Nature as a Commodity: What's Good for Human Health Might Not Be Good for Ecosystem Health
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, September 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01673 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yolanda van Heezik, Eric Brymer |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 2 | 12% |
| United States | 2 | 12% |
| Côte d'Ivoire | 1 | 6% |
| Australia | 1 | 6% |
| Mexico | 1 | 6% |
| Germany | 1 | 6% |
| Canada | 1 | 6% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 12% |
| Unknown | 4 | 24% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 65% |
| Scientists | 5 | 29% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 99 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 20% |
| Researcher | 10 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 5% |
| Professor | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 11 | 11% |
| Unknown | 29 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 15 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 10% |
| Psychology | 10 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 13 | 13% |
| Unknown | 41 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2020.
All research outputs
#1,388,775
of 24,216,270 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#2,849
of 32,542 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,121
of 340,993 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#95
of 744 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,216,270 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,542 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,993 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 744 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.