↓ Skip to main content

Can Slow-Motion Footage of Forehand Strokes Be Used to Immediately Improve Anticipatory Judgments in Tennis?

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Can Slow-Motion Footage of Forehand Strokes Be Used to Immediately Improve Anticipatory Judgments in Tennis?
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, October 2018
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01830
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kazunobu Fukuhara, Tomoko Maruyama, Hirofumi Ida, Takahiro Ogata, Bumpei Sato, Motonobu Ishii, Takahiro Higuchi

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 43 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 14%
Student > Master 6 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 12%
Professor 3 7%
Unspecified 2 5%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 15 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 14 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 9%
Psychology 3 7%
Unspecified 2 5%
Neuroscience 2 5%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 15 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2018.
All research outputs
#13,049,275
of 23,105,443 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#11,938
of 30,514 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#160,954
of 344,304 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#359
of 747 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,105,443 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,514 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,304 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 747 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.