↓ Skip to main content

Investigating Multidimensional Interoceptive Awareness in a Japanese Population: Validation of the Japanese MAIA-J

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Investigating Multidimensional Interoceptive Awareness in a Japanese Population: Validation of the Japanese MAIA-J
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, October 2018
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01855
Pubmed ID
Authors

Masayasu Shoji, Wolf E. Mehling, Martin Hautzinger, Beate M. Herbert

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 70 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 9%
Researcher 6 9%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 30 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 22 31%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 6%
Social Sciences 4 6%
Neuroscience 3 4%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 28 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2020.
All research outputs
#13,493,170
of 23,864,146 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#12,347
of 31,827 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#165,184
of 348,575 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#359
of 756 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,864,146 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,827 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,575 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 756 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.