You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Validity and Reliability of the Dyslexia Checklist for Chinese Children
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01915 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Fang Hou, Ling Qi, Lingfei Liu, Xiu Luo, HuaiTing Gu, Xinyan Xie, Xin Li, Jiajia Zhang, Ranran Song |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 28 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 5 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 11% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 7% |
| Professor | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 11 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Arts and Humanities | 4 | 14% |
| Psychology | 4 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 11% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 11% |
| Unknown | 11 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2018.
All research outputs
#17,992,232
of 23,106,390 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#20,909
of 30,515 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#247,190
of 346,173 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#528
of 761 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,106,390 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,515 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,173 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 761 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.