You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Theory of Predictive Dissonance: Predictive Processing Presents a New Take on Cognitive Dissonance
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02218 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Roope Oskari Kaaronen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 24% |
| Finland | 7 | 21% |
| Zimbabwe | 2 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 6% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Japan | 1 | 3% |
| Denmark | 1 | 3% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 9 | 26% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 23 | 68% |
| Scientists | 11 | 32% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 111 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 12% |
| Researcher | 12 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 10% |
| Lecturer | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 20 | 18% |
| Unknown | 29 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 31 | 28% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 7% |
| Neuroscience | 8 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 6 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 18 | 16% |
| Unknown | 36 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2022.
All research outputs
#1,608,711
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#3,332
of 34,796 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,625
of 451,636 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#98
of 750 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34,796 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,636 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 750 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.