You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Assessing Objective and Verifiable Indicators Associated With Work-Related Stress: Validation of a Structured Checklist for the Assessment and Management of Work-Related Stress
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02424 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Claudio Barbaranelli, Valerio Ghezzi, Cristina Di Tecco, Matteo Ronchetti, Roberta Fida, Monica Ghelli, Benedetta Persechino, Sergio Iavicoli |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 3 | 33% |
| France | 1 | 11% |
| United States | 1 | 11% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 2 | 22% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 78% |
| Scientists | 2 | 22% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 43 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 6 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 9% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 9 | 21% |
| Unknown | 13 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 9 | 21% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 14% |
| Unknown | 15 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2019.
All research outputs
#5,612,651
of 23,116,036 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#8,086
of 30,539 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,980
of 437,203 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#259
of 790 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,116,036 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,539 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,203 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 790 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.