You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
It’s Double Edged: The Positive and Negative Relationships Between the Development of Moral Reasoning and Video Game Play Among Adolescents
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00028 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sarah E. Hodge, Jacqui Taylor, John McAlaney |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 23% |
| United States | 4 | 13% |
| Japan | 2 | 6% |
| Portugal | 1 | 3% |
| Poland | 1 | 3% |
| Sweden | 1 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 12 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 24 | 77% |
| Scientists | 7 | 23% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 68 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 10 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 4% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 13% |
| Unknown | 33 | 49% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 9 | 13% |
| Computer Science | 9 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 7% |
| Arts and Humanities | 4 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Unknown | 33 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 72. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2020.
All research outputs
#606,568
of 25,813,008 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#1,264
of 34,801 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,820
of 449,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#43
of 776 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,813,008 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34,801 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,554 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 776 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.