↓ Skip to main content

Assessing Executive Function in Adolescence: A Scoping Review of Existing Measures and Their Psychometric Robustness

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
190 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Assessing Executive Function in Adolescence: A Scoping Review of Existing Measures and Their Psychometric Robustness
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, March 2019
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00311
Pubmed ID
Authors

Moses K. Nyongesa, Derrick Ssewanyana, Agnes M. Mutua, Esther Chongwo, Gaia Scerif, Charles R. J. C. Newton, Amina Abubakar

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 190 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 190 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 31 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 11%
Student > Bachelor 19 10%
Researcher 15 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 5%
Other 28 15%
Unknown 67 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 65 34%
Neuroscience 15 8%
Social Sciences 8 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 3%
Other 16 8%
Unknown 74 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2024.
All research outputs
#5,372,093
of 25,177,382 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#8,673
of 34,009 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,185
of 360,984 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#296
of 813 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,177,382 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34,009 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,984 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 813 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.