You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Seat Choice in a Crowded Café: Effects of Eye Contact, Distance, and Anchoring
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00331 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Henk Staats, Piet Groot |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 8 | 24% |
| United States | 6 | 18% |
| Australia | 3 | 9% |
| Spain | 2 | 6% |
| Singapore | 1 | 3% |
| Pakistan | 1 | 3% |
| Curaçao | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 12 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 23 | 68% |
| Scientists | 8 | 24% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 45 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 11 | 24% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 16% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 9% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Unknown | 11 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 13 | 29% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 9% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 7% |
| Arts and Humanities | 3 | 7% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 16% |
| Unknown | 13 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2020.
All research outputs
#1,560,576
of 25,217,627 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#3,205
of 34,069 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,406
of 359,518 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#119
of 884 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,217,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34,069 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,518 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 884 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.