You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
How Does Therapy Harm? A Model of Adverse Process Using Task Analysis in the Meta-Synthesis of Service Users' Experience
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00347 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Joe Curran, Glenys D. Parry, Gillian E. Hardy, Jennifer Darling, Ann-Marie Mason, Eleni Chambers |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 22% |
| United States | 4 | 17% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| India | 1 | 4% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 11 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 78% |
| Scientists | 4 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 92 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 11 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 12% |
| Researcher | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 13 | 14% |
| Unknown | 34 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 28 | 30% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Unknown | 37 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2024.
All research outputs
#1,224,515
of 26,119,990 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#2,571
of 35,001 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,860
of 368,157 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#99
of 803 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,119,990 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 35,001 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,157 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 803 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.