You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Career-Specific Parenting Practices and Career Decision-Making Self-Efficacy Among Chinese Adolescents: The Interactive Effects of Parenting Practices and the Mediating Role of Autonomy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00363 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yu Chi Zhang, Nan Zhou, Hongjian Cao, Yue Liang, Shulin Yu, Jian Li, Linyuan Deng, Ruixi Sun, Qinglu Wu, Ping Li, Qing Xiong, Ruihong Nie, Xiaoyi Fang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 91 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 14 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 11% |
| Lecturer | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 9% |
| Unknown | 37 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 29 | 32% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 9% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 4% |
| Arts and Humanities | 3 | 3% |
| Linguistics | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Unknown | 38 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2019.
All research outputs
#15,562,306
of 23,130,383 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#19,111
of 30,577 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#221,055
of 352,928 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#603
of 883 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,130,383 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,577 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,928 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 883 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.