You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Reproducibility and Validity of a Stroke Effectiveness Test in Table Tennis Based on the Temporal Game Structure
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, February 2019
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00427 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Taisa Belli, Milton Shoiti Misuta, Pedro Paulo Ribeiro de Moura, Thomas dos Santos Tavares, Renê Augusto Ribeiro, Yura Yuka Sato dos Santos, Karine Jacon Sarro, Larissa Rafaela Galatti |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 3 | 60% |
Switzerland | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 33 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 4 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 12% |
Lecturer | 2 | 6% |
Researcher | 2 | 6% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 6% |
Other | 6 | 18% |
Unknown | 13 | 39% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Sports and Recreations | 7 | 21% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 12% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
Philosophy | 1 | 3% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 3% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 18 | 55% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2019.
All research outputs
#6,823,236
of 23,130,383 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#9,700
of 30,577 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#127,790
of 353,524 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#341
of 821 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,130,383 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,577 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,524 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 821 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.