↓ Skip to main content

Gender Differences in Body Evaluation: Do Men Show More Self-Serving Double Standards Than Women?

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
11 news outlets
twitter
34 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
142 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Gender Differences in Body Evaluation: Do Men Show More Self-Serving Double Standards Than Women?
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, March 2019
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00544
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mona M. Voges, Claire-Marie Giabbiconi, Benjamin Schöne, Manuel Waldorf, Andrea S. Hartmann, Silja Vocks

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 142 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 142 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 28 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 8%
Researcher 10 7%
Student > Master 10 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 4%
Other 23 16%
Unknown 54 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 30 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 4%
Sports and Recreations 5 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 3%
Other 26 18%
Unknown 61 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 124. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 January 2024.
All research outputs
#342,257
of 25,758,695 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#699
of 34,777 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,640
of 365,912 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#28
of 801 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,758,695 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34,777 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,912 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 801 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.