You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
How and When? Metacognition and Solution Timing Characterize an “Aha” Experience of Object Recognition in Hidden Figures
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01023 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tetsuo Ishikawa, Mayumi Toshima, Ken Mogi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 2 | 29% |
| United States | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 4 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 37 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 19% |
| Researcher | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 11% |
| Unknown | 9 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 16 | 43% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 11% |
| Engineering | 2 | 5% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 3% |
| Philosophy | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 13 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2019.
All research outputs
#6,256,414
of 25,459,177 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#8,904
of 34,515 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,143
of 364,410 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#229
of 562 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,459,177 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34,515 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,410 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 562 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.