You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Toward a Standardized Test of Fearful Temperament in Primates: A Sensitive Alternative to the Human Intruder Task for Laboratory-Housed Rhesus Macaques (Macaca mulatta)
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, May 2019
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01051 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Emily J. Bethell, Lauren C. Cassidy, Ralf R. Brockhausen, Dana Pfefferle |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Germany | 3 | 23% |
Hong Kong | 1 | 8% |
Switzerland | 1 | 8% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 7 | 54% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 8 | 62% |
Members of the public | 5 | 38% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 29 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 28% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 10% |
Researcher | 3 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 7% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 7% |
Other | 4 | 14% |
Unknown | 7 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 7 | 24% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 17% |
Neuroscience | 4 | 14% |
Computer Science | 1 | 3% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 3% |
Other | 2 | 7% |
Unknown | 9 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2019.
All research outputs
#4,231,962
of 25,562,515 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#7,355
of 34,646 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,895
of 365,844 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#187
of 574 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,562,515 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34,646 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,844 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 574 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.