You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evidence-Based Strategies for Improving Diversity and Inclusion in Undergraduate Research Labs
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, June 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01305 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Afra Saeed Ahmad, Isaac Sabat, Rachel Trump-Steele, Eden King |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 47 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 21 | 45% |
| Canada | 3 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 4% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 19 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 30 | 64% |
| Scientists | 16 | 34% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 171 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 171 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 20% |
| Researcher | 24 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 8% |
| Professor | 10 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 38 | 22% |
| Unknown | 42 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 29 | 17% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 7% |
| Psychology | 12 | 7% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 9 | 5% |
| Environmental Science | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 43 | 25% |
| Unknown | 57 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 47. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2023.
All research outputs
#886,012
of 25,378,162 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#1,858
of 34,370 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,113
of 364,169 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#50
of 585 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,378,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34,370 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,169 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 585 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.