You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Necessary Condition Analysis: Type I Error, Power, and Over-Interpretation of Test Results. A Reply to a Comment on NCA. Commentary: Predicting the Significance of Necessity
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01493 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jan Dul, Erwin van der Laan, Roelof Kuik, Maciej Karwowski |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 26 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 23% |
| Other | 5 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 19% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 2 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 4 | 15% |
| Unknown | 2 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Business, Management and Accounting | 9 | 35% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 8% |
| Psychology | 2 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 6 | 23% |
| Unknown | 3 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2019.
All research outputs
#15,577,567
of 23,153,184 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#19,136
of 30,651 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#213,096
of 346,468 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#436
of 590 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,153,184 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,651 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,468 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 590 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.