You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Modum-ED Trial Protocol: Comparing Compassion-Focused Therapy and Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy in Treatment of Eating Disorders With and Without Childhood Trauma: Protocol of a Randomized Trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01638 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
KariAnne R. Vrabel, Bruce Wampold, Daniel S. Quintana, Ken Goss, Glenn Waller, Asle Hoffart |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 60% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 20% |
| Norway | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 60% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 75 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 13% |
| Researcher | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 4% |
| Professor | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 16% |
| Unknown | 34 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 23 | 31% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Unknown | 39 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2019.
All research outputs
#13,513,622
of 23,316,003 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#12,824
of 31,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#168,206
of 347,747 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#329
of 588 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,316,003 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,003 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,747 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 588 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.