↓ Skip to main content

Effects of Open Versus Closed Skill Exercise on Cognitive Function: A Systematic Review

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
106 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
165 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effects of Open Versus Closed Skill Exercise on Cognitive Function: A Systematic Review
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, July 2019
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01707
Pubmed ID
Authors

Qian Gu, Liye Zou, Paul D. Loprinzi, Minghui Quan, Tao Huang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 165 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 165 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 7%
Student > Bachelor 12 7%
Researcher 11 7%
Other 8 5%
Other 22 13%
Unknown 71 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 30 18%
Neuroscience 11 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 5%
Psychology 7 4%
Other 17 10%
Unknown 81 49%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2019.
All research outputs
#15,576,397
of 23,151,828 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#19,136
of 30,650 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#213,532
of 347,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#445
of 603 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,151,828 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,650 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,151 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 603 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.