↓ Skip to main content

Self-Deception Reduces Cognitive Load: The Role of Involuntary Conscious Memory Impairment

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
16 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Self-Deception Reduces Cognitive Load: The Role of Involuntary Conscious Memory Impairment
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, July 2019
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01718
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zengdan Jian, Wenjie Zhang, Ling Tian, Wei Fan, Yiping Zhong

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 38 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 16%
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Lecturer 4 11%
Unspecified 2 5%
Student > Master 2 5%
Other 6 16%
Unknown 14 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 10 26%
Unspecified 2 5%
Neuroscience 2 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Mathematics 1 3%
Other 6 16%
Unknown 15 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2023.
All research outputs
#2,189,964
of 25,165,468 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#4,384
of 33,990 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,266
of 352,419 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#124
of 606 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,165,468 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,990 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,419 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 606 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.