↓ Skip to main content

Variations of Network Centralities Between Playing Positions in Favorable and Unfavorable Close and Unbalanced Scores During the 2018 FIFA World Cup

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Variations of Network Centralities Between Playing Positions in Favorable and Unfavorable Close and Unbalanced Scores During the 2018 FIFA World Cup
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, August 2019
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01802
Pubmed ID
Authors

Filipe Manuel Clemente, Hugo Sarmento, Gibson Moreira Praça, Pantelis Theodoros Nikolaidis, Thomas Rosemann, Beat Knechtle

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 52 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 13%
Student > Postgraduate 5 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 8%
Professor 4 8%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Other 9 17%
Unknown 19 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 21 40%
Computer Science 3 6%
Decision Sciences 2 4%
Psychology 1 2%
Unspecified 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 21 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2019.
All research outputs
#15,577,567
of 23,153,184 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#19,136
of 30,651 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#212,289
of 345,067 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#450
of 620 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,153,184 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,651 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,067 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 620 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.