You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Application of Wearable Technology to Quantify Health and Wellbeing Co-benefits From Urban Wetlands
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, August 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01840 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jonathan P. Reeves, Andrew T. Knight, Emily A. Strong, Victor Heng, Chris Neale, Ruth Cromie, Ans Vercammen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 32% |
| Ireland | 2 | 9% |
| India | 1 | 5% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 5% |
| United States | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 10 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 59% |
| Scientists | 5 | 23% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 14% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 170 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 170 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 31 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 13 | 8% |
| Unknown | 62 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 23 | 14% |
| Psychology | 15 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 5% |
| Engineering | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 34 | 20% |
| Unknown | 69 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 70. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 July 2022.
All research outputs
#596,522
of 25,018,122 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#1,225
of 33,798 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,697
of 348,383 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#36
of 611 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,018,122 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,798 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,383 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 611 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.