You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Primes and Consequences: A Systematic Review of Meritocracy in Intergroup Relations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02007 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ana Filipa Madeira, Rui Costa-Lopes, John F. Dovidio, Gonçalo Freitas, Mafalda F. Mascarenhas |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 10% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 7% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 3% |
| Chile | 1 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| Norway | 1 | 3% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 15 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 23 | 77% |
| Scientists | 6 | 20% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 136 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 8% |
| Researcher | 10 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 20 | 15% |
| Unknown | 53 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 34 | 25% |
| Social Sciences | 18 | 13% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 4% |
| Engineering | 3 | 2% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 17 | 13% |
| Unknown | 57 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2023.
All research outputs
#1,828,362
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#3,735
of 34,766 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,520
of 354,817 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#85
of 611 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34,766 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,817 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 611 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.