You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Working Smarter Not Harder: Oxytocin Increases Domestic Dogs’ (Canis familiaris) Accuracy, but Not Attempts, on an Object Choice Task
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, October 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02141 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jessica Lee Oliva, Manuel Mengoli, Tiago Mendonça, Alessandro Cozzi, Patrick Pageat, Camille Chabaud, Eva Teruel, Céline Lafont-Lecuelle, Cécile Bienboire-Frosini |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 17% |
| Germany | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 4 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 50% |
| Scientists | 2 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 49 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 6 | 12% |
| Unknown | 14 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 14% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 6 | 12% |
| Psychology | 6 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 12% |
| Unknown | 18 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2019.
All research outputs
#14,172,976
of 23,166,665 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#14,446
of 30,673 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#185,728
of 349,851 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#361
of 629 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,166,665 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,673 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,851 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 629 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.