You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Motion Illusions as Environmental Enrichment for Zoo Animals: A Preliminary Investigation on Lions (Panthera leo)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, October 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02220 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Barbara Regaiolli, Angelo Rizzo, Giorgio Ottolini, Maria Elena Miletto Petrazzini, Caterina Spiezio, Christian Agrillo |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 48 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 7 | 15% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 13% |
| United States | 4 | 8% |
| Italy | 3 | 6% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 4% |
| Spain | 2 | 4% |
| Peru | 1 | 2% |
| Congo, The Democratic Republic of the | 1 | 2% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 18 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 37 | 77% |
| Scientists | 7 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 82 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Researcher | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 12% |
| Unknown | 31 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 24% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 11 | 13% |
| Psychology | 8 | 10% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Unknown | 34 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 58. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 December 2022.
All research outputs
#751,895
of 25,722,279 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#1,568
of 34,761 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,312
of 364,492 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#32
of 631 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,722,279 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34,761 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,492 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 631 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.