You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evidence-Based Practice in Psychology Fails to Be Tripartite: A Conceptual Critique of the Scientocentrism in Evidence-Based Practice in Psychology
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, October 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02253 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Henrik Berg |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 18% |
| United States | 2 | 18% |
| Brazil | 1 | 9% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 5 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 55% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 36% |
| Scientists | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 57 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 9% |
| Professor | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 12 | 21% |
| Unknown | 15 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 28 | 49% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 9% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 15 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2023.
All research outputs
#4,373,787
of 26,134,677 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#7,609
of 35,013 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,001
of 369,276 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#178
of 615 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,134,677 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 35,013 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,276 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 615 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.