You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparing Traditional and Digitized Cognitive Tests Used in Standard Clinical Evaluation – A Study of the Digital Application Minnemera
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, October 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02327 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stina Björngrim, Wobbie van den Hurk, Moises Betancort, Alejandra Machado, Maria Lindau |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 87 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 13% |
| Researcher | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 11 | 13% |
| Unknown | 30 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 27 | 31% |
| Neuroscience | 11 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 9% |
| Unknown | 33 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2020.
All research outputs
#2,179,800
of 23,170,347 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#4,303
of 30,680 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,819
of 356,611 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#106
of 602 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,170,347 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,680 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,611 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 602 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.