↓ Skip to main content

Immersive Versus Non-immersive Experience: Exploring the Feasibility of Memory Assessment Through 360° Technology

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
90 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
197 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Immersive Versus Non-immersive Experience: Exploring the Feasibility of Memory Assessment Through 360° Technology
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, November 2019
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02509
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sara Ventura, Eleonora Brivio, Giuseppe Riva, Rosa M. Baños

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 197 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 197 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 15%
Researcher 16 8%
Student > Bachelor 15 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 5%
Other 30 15%
Unknown 84 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 23 12%
Engineering 14 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 6%
Computer Science 12 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 4%
Other 36 18%
Unknown 92 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2019.
All research outputs
#15,866,607
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#19,563
of 31,443 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#224,186
of 361,581 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#408
of 577 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,443 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,581 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 577 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.