You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Is It a Good Idea to Cultivate Lucid Dreaming?
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, November 2019
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02585 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Raphael Vallat, Perrine Marie Ruby |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 168 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Thailand | 30 | 18% |
United Kingdom | 5 | 3% |
United States | 5 | 3% |
Argentina | 3 | 2% |
Italy | 2 | 1% |
France | 2 | 1% |
Canada | 2 | 1% |
Germany | 1 | <1% |
Mexico | 1 | <1% |
Other | 5 | 3% |
Unknown | 112 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 155 | 92% |
Scientists | 10 | 6% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 1% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 62 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 13 | 21% |
Researcher | 10 | 16% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 11% |
Student > Master | 3 | 5% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 3% |
Other | 6 | 10% |
Unknown | 21 | 34% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 16 | 26% |
Neuroscience | 11 | 18% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 5% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
Other | 3 | 5% |
Unknown | 26 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 199. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2023.
All research outputs
#200,130
of 25,564,614 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#423
of 34,650 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,150
of 374,076 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#11
of 580 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,564,614 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34,650 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 374,076 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 580 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.