You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Is Cognitive Training Effective for Improving Executive Functions in Preschoolers? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02812 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nicoletta Scionti, Marina Cavallero, Cristina Zogmaister, Gian Marco Marzocchi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 43 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 7 | 16% |
| Japan | 5 | 12% |
| Spain | 3 | 7% |
| Comoros | 2 | 5% |
| Belgium | 1 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
| Uruguay | 1 | 2% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 21 | 49% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 35 | 81% |
| Scientists | 6 | 14% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 216 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 216 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 25 | 12% |
| Researcher | 21 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 8% |
| Other | 10 | 5% |
| Other | 29 | 13% |
| Unknown | 84 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 66 | 31% |
| Neuroscience | 15 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 16 | 7% |
| Unknown | 100 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 46. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2024.
All research outputs
#906,405
of 25,463,091 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#1,911
of 34,526 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,332
of 476,208 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#50
of 625 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,463,091 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34,526 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 476,208 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 625 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.