You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Assessing Risk Among Correctional Community Probation Populations: Predicting Reoffense With Mobile Neurocognitive Assessment Software
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02926 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gabe Haarsma, Sasha Davenport, Devonte C. White, Pablo A. Ormachea, Erin Sheena, David M. Eagleman |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 3 | 38% |
| United States | 2 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 38% |
| Scientists | 3 | 38% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 58 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 16% |
| Researcher | 8 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 16% |
| Unknown | 17 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 12 | 21% |
| Neuroscience | 5 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 16% |
| Unknown | 22 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,197,189
of 25,362,520 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#2,475
of 34,252 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,807
of 467,565 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#64
of 607 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,362,520 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34,252 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 467,565 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 607 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.