You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Preliminary Study on the Functional Benefits of Computerized Working Memory Training in Children With Pediatric Bipolar Disorder and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, February 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.03060 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alessandra M. Passarotti, Livia Balaban, Liza D. Colman, Lindsay A. Katz, Nidhi Trivedi, Li Liu, Scott A. Langenecker |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 87 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 8% |
| Researcher | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 16 | 18% |
| Unknown | 38 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 20 | 23% |
| Neuroscience | 8 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 9% |
| Unknown | 38 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2020.
All research outputs
#20,609,577
of 23,198,445 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#24,715
of 30,765 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#375,815
of 449,711 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#501
of 586 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,198,445 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,765 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,711 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 586 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.