You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Visual Remote Associates Test and Its Validation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00026 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ana-Maria Olteţeanu, Faheem Hassan Zunjani |
| Abstract |
The Remote Associates Test (RAT) is a widely used test for measuring creativity, specifically the ability to make associations. The Remote Associates Test normally takes a linguistic form: given three words, the participant is asked to come up with a fourth word associated with all three of them. While visual creativity tests do exist, no creativity test to date can be given in both a visual and linguistic form. Such a test would allow the study of differences between various modalities, in the context of the same creative process. In this paper, a visual version of the well-known Remote Associates Test is constructed. This visual RAT is validated in relation to its linguistic counterpart. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 33% |
| Spain | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 41 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 12% |
| Researcher | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 7% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 17% |
| Unknown | 13 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 10 | 24% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 10% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Unknown | 15 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2023.
All research outputs
#2,192,430
of 23,630,563 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#4,307
of 31,516 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,032
of 454,202 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#119
of 603 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,630,563 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,516 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 454,202 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 603 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.