↓ Skip to main content

Is the Role of Ideologists Central in Terrorist Networks? A Social Network Analysis of Indonesian Terrorist Groups

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, March 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Is the Role of Ideologists Central in Terrorist Networks? A Social Network Analysis of Indonesian Terrorist Groups
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, March 2020
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00333
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mirra Noor Milla, Joevarian Hudiyana, Wahyu Cahyono, Hamdi Muluk

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 77 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 9 12%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 9%
Other 3 4%
Student > Master 3 4%
Other 13 17%
Unknown 34 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 13 17%
Social Sciences 12 16%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 4%
Arts and Humanities 3 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Other 10 13%
Unknown 34 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2021.
All research outputs
#2,131,097
of 23,192,960 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#4,182
of 30,744 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,115
of 360,773 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#115
of 636 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,192,960 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,744 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,773 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 636 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.