You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Screening for Cognitive Frailty Using Short Cognitive Screening Instruments: Comparison of the Chinese Versions of the MoCA and Qmci Screen
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, April 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00558 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yangfan Xu, Yangyang Lin, Lingrong Yi, Zhao Li, Xian Li, Yuying Yu, Yuxiao Guo, Yuling Wang, Haoying Jiang, Zhuoming Chen, Anton Svendrovski, Yang Gao, D. William Molloy, Rónán O’Caoimh |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 33% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 36 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 14% |
| Unknown | 17 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 4 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 6% |
| Sports and Recreations | 2 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 14% |
| Unknown | 19 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2020.
All research outputs
#14,418,035
of 23,206,358 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#15,227
of 30,775 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#203,724
of 371,843 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#365
of 588 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,206,358 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,775 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 371,843 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 588 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.