You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Using Two-Step Cluster Analysis and Latent Class Cluster Analysis to Classify the Cognitive Heterogeneity of Cross-Diagnostic Psychiatric Inpatients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01085 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mariagrazia Benassi, Sara Garofalo, Federica Ambrosini, Rosa Patrizia Sant’Angelo, Roberta Raggini, Giovanni De Paoli, Claudio Ravani, Sara Giovagnoli, Matteo Orsoni, Giovanni Piraccini |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 125 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 14% |
| Researcher | 16 | 13% |
| Other | 9 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 19 | 15% |
| Unknown | 34 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 18 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 8 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 34 | 27% |
| Unknown | 40 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2020.
All research outputs
#15,612,741
of 23,213,531 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#19,195
of 30,797 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#249,466
of 399,052 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#519
of 736 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,213,531 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,797 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,052 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 736 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.