You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Should We Pay for Our Social Media/Messenger Applications? Preliminary Data on the Acceptance of an Alternative to the Current Prevailing Data Business Model
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01415 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Cornelia Sindermann, Daria J. Kuss, Melina A. Throuvala, Mark D. Griffiths, Christian Montag |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 3 | 75% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 43 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 14% |
| Researcher | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 12% |
| Unknown | 13 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Business, Management and Accounting | 6 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 14% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 4 | 9% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 9% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 19% |
| Unknown | 13 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2022.
All research outputs
#932,477
of 23,056,273 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#1,905
of 30,375 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,350
of 396,288 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#53
of 757 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,056,273 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,375 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 396,288 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 757 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.