You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Macphail’s Null Hypothesis of Vertebrate Intelligence: Insights From Avian Cognition
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01692 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Amalia P. M. Bastos, Alex H. Taylor |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 22% |
| United States | 3 | 13% |
| Australia | 2 | 9% |
| New Zealand | 2 | 9% |
| Brazil | 1 | 4% |
| Mexico | 1 | 4% |
| Bahamas | 1 | 4% |
| Japan | 1 | 4% |
| Belgium | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 6 | 26% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 48% |
| Scientists | 9 | 39% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 28 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 29% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 18% |
| Other | 4 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 5 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 36% |
| Psychology | 6 | 21% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 4% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 7 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2021.
All research outputs
#2,494,980
of 24,837,702 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#4,937
of 33,501 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,793
of 402,197 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#160
of 803 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,837,702 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,501 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 402,197 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 803 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.