You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Systematic Review of Associations Between Interoception, Vagal Tone, and Emotional Regulation: Potential Applications for Mental Health, Wellbeing, Psychological Flexibility, and Chronic Conditions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, August 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01792 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Thomas Pinna, Darren J. Edwards |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 40% |
| Mexico | 1 | 20% |
| United States | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 210 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 210 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 10% |
| Researcher | 19 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 9% |
| Other | 10 | 5% |
| Other | 31 | 15% |
| Unknown | 77 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 55 | 26% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 7% |
| Neuroscience | 13 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 25 | 12% |
| Unknown | 88 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 124. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2022.
All research outputs
#295,911
of 23,507,888 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#597
of 31,334 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,724
of 400,029 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#14
of 776 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,507,888 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,334 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 400,029 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 776 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.