You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Testing a Self-Determination Theory Model of Healthy Eating in a South African Township
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, August 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02181 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jeroen De Man, Edwin Wouters, Peter Delobelle, Thandi Puoane, Meena Daivadanam, Pilvikki Absetz, Roy Remmen, Josefien van Olmen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| South Africa | 3 | 43% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 57% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 29% |
| Scientists | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 74 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 11% |
| Researcher | 7 | 9% |
| Lecturer | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 11 | 15% |
| Unknown | 27 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 12% |
| Psychology | 7 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 13 | 18% |
| Unknown | 31 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2021.
All research outputs
#3,988,369
of 22,880,230 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#6,749
of 29,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,059
of 397,498 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#221
of 778 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,880,230 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 397,498 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 778 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.