You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Hunger Bias or Gut Instinct? Responses to Judgments of Harm Depending on Visceral State Versus Intuitive Decision-Making
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, September 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02261 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Helen Brown, Michael J. Proulx, Danaë Stanton Fraser |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Germany | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Scientists | 2 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 57 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 7% |
| Researcher | 3 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 21% |
| Unknown | 20 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 18 | 32% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 12% |
| Unknown | 23 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2021.
All research outputs
#13,396,990
of 23,318,744 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#12,617
of 31,012 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#194,621
of 408,602 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#422
of 793 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,318,744 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,012 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 408,602 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 793 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.