↓ Skip to main content

Caught in the Crossfire: How Contradictory Information and Norms on Social Media Influence Young Women’s Intentions to Receive HPV Vaccination in the United States and China

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, December 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Caught in the Crossfire: How Contradictory Information and Norms on Social Media Influence Young Women’s Intentions to Receive HPV Vaccination in the United States and China
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, December 2020
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.548365
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shuya Pan, Di Zhang, Jingwen Zhang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 8%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Librarian 1 4%
Lecturer 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 11 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 5 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 12%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Computer Science 1 4%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 10 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 December 2020.
All research outputs
#13,724,124
of 23,267,128 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#13,680
of 30,890 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#244,623
of 509,311 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#505
of 921 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,267,128 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,890 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 509,311 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 921 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.