↓ Skip to main content

Factorial Structure of the Serbian Version of the Clinical Assessment Interview for Negative Symptoms – Evidence for Three Factors of Negative Symptoms

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, October 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Factorial Structure of the Serbian Version of the Clinical Assessment Interview for Negative Symptoms – Evidence for Three Factors of Negative Symptoms
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, October 2020
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.570356
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ivan Ristić, Stefan Jerotić, Mirjana Zebić, Bojana Savić, Vuk Vuković, Manuela Russo, Tatjana Voskresenski, Nikolina Jovanović, Nađa P. Marić

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 25%
Lecturer 1 13%
Other 1 13%
Student > Bachelor 1 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 13%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 3 38%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 13%
Neuroscience 1 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 13%
Unknown 2 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2021.
All research outputs
#6,562,481
of 23,267,128 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#9,614
of 30,890 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#144,836
of 420,611 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#366
of 883 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,267,128 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,890 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,611 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 883 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.