↓ Skip to main content

Do Disadvantageous Social Contexts Influence Food Choice? Evidence From Three Laboratory Experiments

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, November 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Do Disadvantageous Social Contexts Influence Food Choice? Evidence From Three Laboratory Experiments
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, November 2020
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.575170
Pubmed ID
Authors

Qëndresa Rramani, Holger Gerhardt, Xenia Grote, Weihua Zhao, Johannes Schultz, Bernd Weber

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 26%
Student > Bachelor 5 15%
Student > Master 3 9%
Lecturer 2 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 8 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 9 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 9%
Engineering 3 9%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 6%
Neuroscience 2 6%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 10 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2021.
All research outputs
#6,292,544
of 23,257,423 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#9,050
of 30,890 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#137,389
of 420,857 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#366
of 914 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,257,423 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,890 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,857 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 914 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.