↓ Skip to main content

Corruption, Fast or Slow? Ethical Leadership Interacts With Machiavellianism to Influence Intuitive Thinking and Corruption

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, November 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Corruption, Fast or Slow? Ethical Leadership Interacts With Machiavellianism to Influence Intuitive Thinking and Corruption
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, November 2020
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.578419
Pubmed ID
Authors

Muhammad U. Manara, Suzanne van Gils, Annika Nübold, Fred R. H. Zijlstra

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 68 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 9 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 10%
Student > Master 5 7%
Other 4 6%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 31 46%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 14 21%
Psychology 9 13%
Social Sciences 4 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 6%
Arts and Humanities 3 4%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 30 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2024.
All research outputs
#6,929,359
of 25,537,395 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#9,769
of 34,613 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#139,913
of 433,790 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#371
of 892 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,537,395 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34,613 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,790 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 892 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.