↓ Skip to main content

Between Conspiracy Beliefs, Ingroup Bias, and System Justification: How People Use Defense Strategies to Cope With the Threat of COVID-19

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, September 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
12 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
Title
Between Conspiracy Beliefs, Ingroup Bias, and System Justification: How People Use Defense Strategies to Cope With the Threat of COVID-19
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, September 2020
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.578586
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chiara A. Jutzi, Robin Willardt, Petra C. Schmid, Eva Jonas

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 101 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 14%
Student > Bachelor 13 13%
Student > Master 11 11%
Other 7 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 7%
Other 16 16%
Unknown 33 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 38 38%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 9%
Social Sciences 6 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Environmental Science 2 2%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 35 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2021.
All research outputs
#1,282,605
of 23,234,261 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#2,622
of 30,853 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,705
of 411,464 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#93
of 801 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,234,261 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,853 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 411,464 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 801 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.